GRADE LEVEL SECTION SUB-SECTION DURATION
12 SOUTH AFRICAN HISTORY FROM RESISTANCE TO DEMOCRACY 5 LESSONS

Resistance and Extra Parliamentary Activities
The Formation of the UDF


BACK TO LESSON MENU


TOWARDS A UNITED FRONT


Source B
(Source: Images of defiance, SAHA Wits University, Historical papers)
Poster
produced during the launch of the UDF

The idea to form an organisation that would unite Indian, Coloured, and African people began in the late 1970s and grew in the 1980s. This organisation would be independent from the banned African National Congress. During late 1970s and early 1980s hundreds of political resistance organisations emerged across all sectors of society. Organisations such as the Release Nelson Mandela Committee and the End Conscription Committee dealt with specific political issues. Others such as trade unions, church, student and womens organisations mobilised members around the specific impact of apartheid on them such as labour and gender issues. An umbrella body was needed for uniting and optimising the impact of these different efforts to challenge apartheid. At the Congress of the Transvaal Anti-South African Indian Council (TASC) held in January 1983, Popo Molefe and Cas Saloojee raised the idea of a united front. Some activists within TASC, like Ismail Momoniat and Valli Moosa had to be persuaded to accept the proposal. Saloojee announced the formation of a United Front during a press conference.

Picture by Omar Badsha
Source C: Annoucement of the formation of a united front

One outstanding question remained: What was the front to be called? Some participants in the commission had proposed the name National Democratic Front (NDF), which was the name of a communist-led front against dictatorship in the Philippines. Activists also identified with fronts in Nicaragua and elsewhere which called themselves ‘nationalist’ fronts. But Western Cape activists opposed this suggestion because of the ideological significance of the name. A national front implied a national struggle, whereas the idea of a united front drew on a tradition, which saw the struggle in terms of the class as well. Cape Town activists were wary of any initiative that smacked of popularism and nationalism. The debate was resolved almost by accident. Saloojee thought that the commission had chosen the name NDF for time being, and the typed draft of the statement referred to the ‘national democratic front’ and NDF – although some of the references to the NDF were scratched out, and UDF written in by hand instead! When Saloojee addressed the meeting the next day, he used, he says, ‘the words united democratic front’ to describe the movement – united and hopefully very democratic. The press recorded the call as being for a United Democratic Front, and the name stuck. A retyped version of the commission referred to the UDF only. ‘In the confusion, the name, “united” instead of a “national” took hold.’

Source D
E
xtract taken from Seekings, J. The UDF: A History of the United Democratic Front in South Africa 1983 - 1991

DID YOU KNOW
In 1982, prior the new Constitution in 1983, the government introduced the Koornhof Bills: the Orderly Movement and Settlement of Black Persons Bills, the Black Community Development Bill and the Black Local Authority Bill.


Learning Outcome 2 Historical concepts: The learner will be expected to have an informed understanding of key concepts as ways of analysing the past. They will be expected to understand and explain the dynamics of change in the context of power relations operating in societies. They will also be expected to compare and contrast points of view/perspectives of the past and draw their own conclusions based on evidence

Activity 2

Study sources B, C and D

  1. How did the idea to form a united front come about?
  2. How does source B illustrate that the UDF consisted of various groups of people?
  3. Do you think source B is correct to say, “UDF unites – Apartheid divides”? Support your answer.
  4. In Source D what was the initial name given to a united front and how did it change?
  5. In Source D, why was the idea of a national front opposed?
  6. Thinking about racial and gender representation, what is the message that Source C puts across, how do the other sources, A and B, support that message?
  7. Source B, says “forward to People’s Power”, to whom does this refer ?

 

<PREVIOUS / NEXT>

 

BACK TO LESSON MENU